G2 coach Eetu “sAw” Saha said his team is “stagnating” after another narrow defeat at PGL Masters Bucharest, where G2 lost 0-2 to Aurora and slipped to a single series win in their last six matches.
The European side have been close in recent maps, but that has not translated into results. Against Aurora, G2 again found themselves in tight rounds on both maps and came up short, extending a run that has turned a strong showing at FISSURE Playground 3 into a difficult spell. Saha’s concern was not that G2 are being blown out; it was that the team keeps losing the same kinds of moments late in rounds.
Late-round decisions are costing G2
Saha said the latest loss followed a familiar pattern: G2 get into promising positions, then fail to close them out when the round gets messy. He highlighted Aurora’s late-round swings as the kind of sequences that keep deciding these matches.
“There’s no prize in getting it close and then losing,” sAw said.
He pointed to specific rounds in the Aurora series, including a 2v5 from woxic and a 3v5 where kyxsan found a multi-kill at Sandbags while G2 were not fully aligned on the response. In Saha’s view, those situations are not simply about one player making a mistake or one opponent pulling off a clutch. They are also about whether G2 are reading the round together and making the same call at the same time.
“We need to be making better decisions individually, and then of course as a team also in connecting these last final seconds or moments of the round,” he said. “Closing it out, being patient and having the trust that we will close it out instead of doing an individual decision.”
Saha added that the issue is partly mental and partly tactical. Some players appear to feel pressure to end the round themselves, while in other spots the team is simply not on the same page. That can lead to a late peek, a missed trade, or a hesitation that hands the round back to the opponent. In a series with close scorelines, those are the moments that decide everything.
He also said G2 have already discussed a similar issue after their ESL Pro League run, where they went out 1-3. Even then, Saha felt the team’s problems were concentrated around after-plant and XvX situations where advantages should have been turned into round wins.
The same problems are showing up again
G2’s run in Bucharest has not been a matter of being outclassed from start to finish. Saha said the team have reached enough winnable positions to suggest the structure is not completely broken, but the execution in the final moments keeps slipping away. That has made the losses feel especially frustrating, because the underlying shape of the matches has often looked better than the final scoreline.
He said the team have to go back through those sequences and work out why they are not converting them consistently. That includes communication, trading, and simple decision-making under pressure. It is not always the same setup that causes the problem, either. Sometimes the team has map control and utility, sometimes they do not. Sometimes one player is low on health, sometimes the AWP is available, sometimes the teammate pool changes. The challenge, as Saha described it, is learning how to win those different versions of the same late-round situation.
At the same time, G2 have shown the opposite can happen too. Saha pointed to the start of Inferno on the T side, where MATYS and HeavyGod helped the team win a couple of first full buys. That, he said, is why the issue is not a single isolated flaw. G2 can still win difficult rounds, but the balance has tilted too often toward mistakes at crucial points.
“Right now it’s like we’re stagnating or maybe even took a couple of steps backward,” he said.
The coach said the team wanted to use the time they had practiced from home to make more visible progress. Instead, he feels the recent stretch has not delivered the jump forward they were hoping for. That sense has grown more pronounced because G2 have also been facing strong opposition, making it harder to separate form issues from opponent quality. Even so, he was clear that the team would rather be seeing improvement regardless of who is across the server.
r1nkle remains a work in progress
Saha also addressed the form of Artem “r1nkle” Moroz, who has been one of the most scrutinized players in the lineup since joining G2. He said the move was understood from the beginning to be risky and unlikely to settle immediately.
According to Saha, G2 are trying to balance two things at once: giving r1nkle room to add his own ideas, while also keeping him comfortable enough to perform in officials. The team want him involved in the structure, but they do not want to overload him with information or force him too far outside his comfort zone. That balance, Saha said, is part of every roster change, especially with an AWPer.
He said the team always knew the adjustment would take time and that it was never expected to work fully in a month. With so many officials on the schedule, he described the current period as another test for both the player and the team around him.
Even so, Saha said he likes the way r1nkle approaches the game. He praised his openness and mindset, and said he has been doing many of the right things on the mental side. The coach still wants more from the AWP role, though, and said G2 need r1nkle to get as much space as possible while continuing to grow into the system.
For now, the result in Bucharest leaves G2 on the back foot and in need of a quick response. Saha said the team have no choice but to grind through the situation game by game and try to turn the next close finish into an actual win.
“The only way to go is grind back and try to reach playoffs game by game,” he said.
The interview leaves G2 with a clear diagnosis, if not an easy fix: the team are still competitive in the round, but not synchronized when it matters most. Against Aurora, that gap was enough to turn another close series into another loss.
Join the discussion