A new 25-minute Grand Theft Auto 6 clip from the leaker known as Cyberleek is circulating online, and it shows protagonist Jason naked for much of the video. The footage has spread through r/GamingLeaksAndRumours and social media after Cyberleek returned from a hiatus with what appears to be another video taken from a GTA 6 development build.
According to PC Gamer, Jason’s genitals are fully modelled, with physics, in the clip. Lucia also appears topless from behind and wearing a thong. The video is the latest piece of leaked GTA 6 material to keep the game’s sexual content in the spotlight, even though the finished game still has not been shown with those elements in a retail setting.
What the new clip appears to show
PC Gamer says the new video runs for 25 minutes and features Jason naked through much of it. The publication also notes that this is not the first leaked Cyberleek clip to show nudity: another video from the same source previously showed fully nude NPCs.
One of the more telling details in the new footage is a floating tank partway through the clip. PC Gamer says that makes it clear at least some console-command or developer-tool activity is in play. NPCs also do not react to Jason’s nakedness, which points in the same direction. The video additionally shows first-person driving, a feature GTA 6 had previously been reported not to include.
Those details leave the clip hard to read as proof of normal gameplay. It may show real in-game assets, but the tank, the lack of response from NPCs and the first-person driving all suggest a development environment rather than the final rule set players will get.
- The clip runs for about 25 minutes.
- Jason spends much of it naked.
- His genitals are fully modelled, according to PC Gamer.
- Lucia appears topless from behind and wears a thong.
- A floating tank appears during the video.
- NPCs do not react to Jason’s nudity.
- The video includes first-person driving.
IGN’s preview did not show Jason’s penis
IGN separately reported that it had already seen a naked Jason during an official preview of GTA 6, but not in a way that exposed him fully. The publication said Jason was naked in a shower scene, yet “thanks to some carefully positioned camera angles, his modesty remained entirely intact.” In other words, IGN saw nudity, but not full frontal exposure.
“Thanks to some carefully positioned camera angles, his modesty remained entirely intact.”
IGN also said it could not confirm what Rockstar has or has not rendered beneath the belt. Its report pointed out that the leaker’s footage could be from an earlier build, that some assets may exist only in developer versions, and that the final game could still differ from what the clips show.
The series has included male nudity before. IGN noted that GTA 5 offered a semi-obscured look at Trevor’s genitals in a cutscene, and that GTA 4’s The Lost and Damned DLC featured a prominent male character with full frontal nudity. The new Cyberleek clip therefore does not establish a first for the franchise, even if it is the most explicit look yet tied to GTA 6.
What earlier rating material had already revealed
The leak also sits alongside the previously reported European PEGI rating for GTA 6. IGN quoted the rating as saying: “There are also strong sexual themes, including nudity, scenes of intercourse and occasional scenes of sexual fetishes.” The rating also said that in some nightclubs, the player can pay for private dances and move their hands onto dancers’ breasts and buttocks.
That rating confirmed that nudity would be part of the game, but it stopped short of saying whether players would see full-frontal nudity. Between that information and the official preview, the existence of sexual content in GTA 6 is no longer in doubt; the open question is how explicit Rockstar intends the final release to be.
PC Gamer also places the reaction to the new clip in the context of older GTA controversies, including Hot Coffee. Its reporting suggests the shock level around game nudity has changed over time, though it does not argue that the argument has disappeared. The larger point is that explicit content in games now arrives in a very different public environment from the one that surrounded earlier GTA scandals.
Cyberleek’s return and Rockstar’s response
Cyberleek’s return is part of the latest wave of GTA 6 leak chatter, and PC Gamer says the leaker is now claiming to have a “project” underway and is asking people to help fund it. The publication says it does not recommend supporting that effort.
Take-Two and Rockstar are still looking for the person behind the leaks, according to PC Gamer, but the article says there have been no new developments recently. That leaves the circulating clip as the main fresh source of speculation, even though it raises as many questions as it answers.
PC Gamer’s report leaves the same basic uncertainty in place: the footage appears to show nudity, but it is not proof that players will be able to walk around naked in the retail game. The floating tank, the unreactive NPCs and the first-person driving all point to developer tools or debug conditions, and Lucia’s thong raises the separate question of whether the game handles nudity consistently across different scenes and characters.
What is clear is that GTA 6 already has a paper trail of sexual content through the PEGI rating, and now has a second visual example through Cyberleek’s leak. What remains unclear is where Rockstar will draw the line in the final version.
floating tank is the wild part
nah, that sounds like dev build nonsense
sure, but dev build or not, it’s still showing what they have in the asset pipeline. If Jason’s model is fully there with physics and Lucia’s scene exists too, that’s not nothing. The tank just means the clip isn’t clean retail footage, not that the nudity part is fake.
in a lot of old GTA leaks, weird debug stuff was mixed with real assets too. so yeah, the tank kills the ‘this is gameplay’ angle, but it does not automatically kill the character models. both can be true.
fair, still weird as hell tho
would you even want full nudity?
Jason getting shower-scene treatment already tells me Rockstar knows exactly what it is doing here. The floating tank makes the clip feel less like ‘proof’ and more like someone poking around a debug build.
If it is dev footage, that is exactly why the tank matters. It means people are acting like a leak proves final-game behaviour when it mostly proves someone found a naughty camera angle in a work-in-progress build.
or it proves both
Both is possible, yes. I just do not trust a clip with a floating tank to tell me what Rockstar will lock in for launch.
will the final game even allow this?
do you think the first-person driving means they changed plans?
No, it means the leak is messy. First-person driving in a dev build is not a promise for retail.
yeah that makes sense, just hoped it was a real feature
I keep seeing people obsess over the nudity part while the bigger takeaway is the rating already spoiled the spicy stuff anyway. The real question is whether Rockstar leaves all this in as a joke or cuts it back for the final release because the internet is acting like a peep show is now a feature list. I would bet they keep some scenes and hide most of it behind camera angles, because that is how these games usually dodge the line. If anything, the leak just reminds everyone how much of GTA’s old shock value depends on context, not just raw pixels.
I agree with the camera angle part. The rating already said nudity and sexual themes, so the leak is more about how explicit they go than if it exists at all.
lol yeah, the true endgame is not crime or chaos, it is camera placement apparently. rockstar making sure the most important npc in the whole game is the one holding the lens at the right angle. love that for modern gaming.
hot take, the leak is pointless
not really. even a messy leak tells you they are still testing how far they want to go with sexual content. the PEGI text already pointed at nudity and weird nightclub stuff, so a clip like this just fills in the gap a bit. it does not prove final gameplay, but it does show Rockstar is not shy about building the systems for it. that is useful info even if the footage is ugly as hell.